From the perspective of authors, we deliver the objective evaluation on the credibility of this journal as follows: Peer review system The journal adopts standardized double-blind peer review. Reviewers put forward targeted, academic and constructive suggestions, which effectively improved the logic and completeness of our manuscript. The review cycle is reasonable without unnecessary delays. Editorial standardization Editors strictly abide by international publishing norms. Communications during revision, proofreading and post-publication procedures are efficient and standardized. No irregular manipulation or biased judgment occurred in our publishing experience. Publication ethics management The journal has complete ethical rules to prevent plagiarism, duplicate submission and improper authorship. All ethical statements and conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements are clearly notified to authors in advance. Publishing service and database indexing The layout, proofreading and online release work are finished with high quality. One suggestion for optimization: we respectfully ask the journal to expedite the PubMed indexing process once articles are formally published, so as to expand the visibility and accessibility of academic findings. Overall, we highly recognize the credibility and academic standards of this journal and are satisfied with the entire publishing process. We have one suggestion: we respectfully request the editorial office to expedite the indexing of this published article in PubMed to make our research results easier to retrieve for researchers around the world. Thank you to all editorial staff for your careful and professional work throughout the publication process.